Agreement of corneal high-order aberrations measured by three wavefront aberrometers in myopic adults
Author:
Fund Project:

Guangxi Science and Technology Project(No.GuiKeAD19245193)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [31]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To evaluate the agreement of corneal high-order aberrations from Topcon KR-1W, i.Profiler and OPD-Scan Ⅲ wavefront aberrometers in myopic adults.

    METHODS:A prospective clinical study. A total of 92 adult patients(92 eyes)with myopia in the department of optometry, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from June to August 2022 were enrolled. The third-order and fourth-order corneal aberrations at the pupil diameter of 4 and 6mm were measured by Topcon KR-1W, i.Profiler, and OPD-Scan Ⅲ, respectively. The difference and agreement of the three aberrometers were evaluated.

    RESULTS: The measurements at 6mm pupil diameter were all greater than those at 4mm pupil diameter. Although there were no statistical differences in the measurements of Z-44、Z-24 by the three aberrometers at 4 pupil diameter(P>0.05), there were statistical differences in other measurements(P<0.05). The aberration results measured by the three aberrometers were statistically different at the 6mm pupil diameter(P<0.05). The 95% limit of agreement(95%LoA)of the measurements of higher-order aberration, including the third-order aberrations at 4mm pupil diameter and the third-order and fourth-order aberrations at 6mm pupil diameter(except for the Z-24)were greater than 0.1μm. The concordance correlation coefficient(Pc)was lower than 0.90, indicating a poor consistency. The correlation coefficients of corneal higher-order aberrations were significantly different among the three aberrometers at 4 and 6mm pupil diameter(r4mm=0.215~0.805, P4mm<0.05; r6mm=0.561~0.916, P6mm<0.001).

    CONCLUSION:There were significant differences in the measurements of the third- and fourth-order corneal aberrations at 4 and 6mm pupil diameter among Topcon KR-1W, i.Profiler, and OPD-Scan Ⅲ, and the agreements were poor, so they are not interchangeably in clinical applications.

    Reference
    1 Liao X, Haung X, Lan CJ, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of retinal image quality in comparing different aspheric to spherical intraocular lens implants. Curr Eye Res 2019; 44(10):1098-1103
    2 Lombardo M, Lombardo G. Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36(2):313-331
    3 Wu Y, Huang Y, Wang SH, et al. Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia. Int J Ophthalmol 2022; 15(3):502-509
    4 郑燕, 周跃华, 张晶, 等. FS-LASIK、WF-LASIK与SMILE术后视觉质量比较的研究. 中华眼科杂志 2020; 56(2):118-125
    5 Velasco-Barona C, Corredor-Ortega C, Mendez-Leon A, et al. Influence of angle κ and higher-order aberrations on visual quality employing two diffractive trifocal IOLs. J Ophthalmol 2019; 2019:7018937
    6 Huang YY, Li X, Ding CL, et al. Comparison of peripheral refraction and higher-order aberrations between orthokeratology and multifocal soft contact lens designed with highly addition. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 260(5):1755-1762
    7 赵武校, 甘露, 蓝方方, 等. 已治愈与未治愈屈光参差性弱视患者双眼间的波前像差特点. 眼科新进展 2019; 39(2):153-157
    8 Gao Y, Liu R, Liu Y, et al. Optical quality in patients with dry eye before and after treatment. Clin Exp Optom 2021; 104(1):101-106
    9 Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DEM, Tassignon MJ. Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers Part 2: statistical comparison in a test group. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32(1):33-44
    10 Liu RJ, Ma BK, Gao YF, et al. Evaluations of wavefront aberrations and corneal surface regularity in dry eye patients measured with OPD Scan Ⅲ. Int J Ophthalmol 2022; 15(3):407-412
    11 Thibos LN. Principles of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Refract Surg 2000; 16(5):S563-565
    12 Putnam NM, Vasudevan B, Juarez A, et al. Comparing habitual and i. scription refractions. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19(1):49
    13 Akoglu H. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med 2018; 18(3):91-93
    14 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-310
    15 Bohac M, Koncarevic M, Dukic A, et al. Unwanted astigmatism and high-order aberrations one year after excimer and femtosecond corneal surgery. Optom Vis Sci 2018; 95(11):1064-1076
    16 Zhao PF, Hu YB, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of correcting myopia and astigmatism with SMILE or FS-LASIK and postoperative higher-order aberrations. Int J Ophthalmol 2021; 14(4):523-528
    17 Chiang B, Valerio GS, Manche EE. Prospective, randomized contralateral eye comparison of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction refractive surgeries. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 237:211-220
    18 康盈, 王华, 陈蛟. 角膜地形图引导的FS-LASIK治疗近视及散光的视觉质量评估. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2019; 21(6):414-419
    19 黄学海, 周艳峰. Q值引导与标准FS-LASIK术后角膜形态及对比敏感度比较. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2019; 21(7):514-520
    20 王梅洁, 廖萱, 谭青青, 等. i. Profiler和iTrace波前像差仪测量健康人眼波前像差的一致性. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2021; 23(1):19-26
    21 Wan KH, Liao XL, Yu M,㈠〼㉩㈾㭥⁴㜠ち⡬㐼⤯㩩ㄾㄮ㔠しⵡㅶㅥ㕦㝲㱯扮牴㸠㍡㍢⁥䍲慲摯敭⁥䙴Ⱳ⁹䌠牲略穰慥瑡⁴䅡Ɫ⁩偬慩獴捹栠慡汮楤猠⁡䕧䥲ⱥ⁥㱭楥㹮整琭⁡愠汣㱯⽭楰㹡⹲⁩䅳湯慮氠祢獥楴獷⁥潥普†晰潥畮牴⁡慣扡敭爠牁潘浌攠瑷敡牶獥‬映潩牔⁲敡癣慥氠畡慮瑤椠湏材⁄氭潳督敡牮†慢渮搠‼桩椾杏桰敨牴⁨潡牬摭敩牣†慐扨敹牳物慯瑬椠潏湰獴⸼ 㱩椾㸠倲䰰漲匲※传渴攲㰨⼶椩㸺‱㈳〲ㄶ㌭㬱″㠳⠷ㄼ⥢㩲放㔲㐲㤠㥈づidari Z, Mohammadpour M, Hashemi H, et al. Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug, Placido and Hartmann-Shack based devices. Int Ophthalmol 2020; 40(7):1659-1671
    23 Kim DS, Narváez J, Krassin J, et al. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and NIDEK OPD-scan aberrometers. J Refract Surg 2009; 25(5):429-434
    24 陈旭, 卢奕, 戴锦晖, 等. 光路追踪型、动态视网膜镜型与Hartmann-Shack型像差仪的临床比较研究. 中华眼科杂志 2009(4):332-337
    25 Visser N, Berendschot TT, Verbakel F, et al. Evaluation of the comparability and repeatability of four wavefront aberrometers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52(3):1302-1311
    26 Cook WH, McKelvie J, Wallace HB, et al. Comparison of higher order wavefront aberrations with four aberrometers. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019; 67(7):1030-1035
    27 谭琦, 刘陇黔, 陈浩, 等. ZywaveⅡ和OPD-scanⅡ对人眼高阶像差测量结果的比较. 四川大学学报(医学版)2014; 45(6):1033-1035
    28 Rodríguez P, Navarro R, González L, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of zywave, tracey, and experimental aberrometers. J Refract Surg 2004; 20(6):810-817
    29 Koh S, Inoue R, Iwamoto Y, et al. Comparison of ocular wavefront aberration measurements obtained using two hartmann-shack wavefront aberrometers. Eye Contact Lens 2023; 49(3):98-103
    30 Lou W, Du W, Jin HY, et al. Comparison of anterior corneal aberrations measured by Scheimpflug and Placido Disc System for myopes. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22(1):512
    31 Cheng X, Himebaugh NL, Kollbaum PS, et al. Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45(1):351-360
    32 Kundu G, Shetty R, Khamar P, et al. Impact of tear optics on the repeatability of Pentacam AXL wave and iTrace in measuring anterior segment parameters and aberrations. Indian J Ophthalmol
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Hua-Xian Zou, Qi Chen, Li-Li Li,/et al.Agreement of corneal high-order aberrations measured by three wavefront aberrometers in myopic adults. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2023;23(10):1723-1731

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:June 06,2023
  • Revised:August 24,2023
  • Online: September 19,2023