Comparison of early visual quality between PPCIOL implantation and femtosecond laser LASIK
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [14]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the effects of posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation(PPCIOL)and femtosecond laser LASIK in the treatment of high myopia on postoperative visual quality.

    METHODS: Randomly selected 83 patients with 168 eyes with high myopia from 2015-06/2017-06 in our hospital, they were divided into two groups according to the treatment. Group A was treated with PPCIOL, and group B was treated with femtosecond laser LASIK. The efficacy index, safety index, visual acuity and diopter, high-order aberration changes, contrast sensitivity values, and complications in both group were compared.

    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the efficacy index between the two groups(P>0.05), and the safety index of group A was higher than that of group B(P<0.05). The number of patients with UCVA and BCVA greater ≥1.0 after surgery in both groups were increased, while the diopter decreased, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Compared with preoperative, there was no significant difference in the contrast sensitivity between the visual acuity, scotopic glare and glare in group A(P>0.05). Compared with group A, the visual sensitivity, glare-free glare and glare contrast sensitivity values of group B decreased, and the differences between groups and groups were statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).

    CONCLUSION: PPCIOL and femtosecond laser LASIK can effectively correct the vision of patients with high myopia, but PPCIOL has less influence on high-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity, and has more advantages in postoperative visual quality.

    Reference
    1 Ikuno Y. Overview of the complications of high myopia. Retina 2017; 37(12):2347-2351
    2张唯伟,陈爱蔚,姬红婄,等. 高度近视有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术50例临床观察. 贵州医药 2017; 41(2):191-192
    3蒋宏苏,伍卫华,王微微. 飞秒激光LASlK与机械刀SBK治疗高度近视的视觉质量分析. 国际眼科杂志 2015; 15(7):1168-1171
    4于妍娉. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术矫治高度近视. 国际眼科杂志 2016; 16(1):132-134
    5王幼生,廖瑞瑞. 现代眼视光学. 广东:广东科技出版社 2004:153-157
    6 Sönmez K, Kele瘙塂 A. Macular Buckling Surgery for Retinal Detachment Associated with Macular Hole in High Myopia Eye. Turk J Ophthalmol 2017; 47(6):351-354
    7 Shoeibi N, Moghadas Sharif N, Daneshvar R,et al.Visual field assessment in high myopia with and without tilted optic disc. Clin Exp Optom 2017; 100(6):690-694
    8王瑞娜,郭红亮,马挺,等. 有晶状体后房型人工晶状体植入术与飞秒激光LASIK术后视觉质量的比较. 中华实验眼科杂志 2017; 35(9):833-837
    9李旭青,蔡晓峰,庹瑶,等. 有晶体眼后房型人工晶体植入术治疗超高度近视的临床疗效及安全性探究. 检验医学与临床 2015; 12(16):2369-2370,2374
    10鞠燕,高晓唯,任兵,等. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术治疗高度近视3年随访分析. 西北国防医学杂志 2015; 36(4):221-223
    11马可,王琳,邱乐梅,等. 高度近视眼有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术后调节功能变化. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2015; 17(8):471-473
    12赵秋富,李冀,班景飞,等. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视术后视觉质量的变化分析. 临床眼科杂志 2016; 24(4):300-302
    13王晓贞,付晶,王京辉,等. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入术后双眼视觉的变化. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2015; 17(8):468-470
    14李琴,张少维,黄毅. 有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体植入矫正高度近视的临床观察. 国际眼科杂志 2016; 16(9):1709-1711
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Ya Deng, Li-Fang Lu, Juan Xu,/et al.Comparison of early visual quality between PPCIOL implantation and femtosecond laser LASIK. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2019;19(4):559-562

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1277
  • PDF: 1082
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:November 27,2018
  • Revised:March 13,2019
  • Online: March 22,2019