Consistency of two eye anterior segment analysis systems measuring wave-front aberration before and after refractive surgery
Author:
Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81500697)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [13]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To study the consistency of pre-operative and postoperative wave-front aberration between SCHWIND and SIRIUS eye anterior segment analysis system.

    METHODS: Prospective control study. A total of 360 eyes of 180 patients with refractive errors in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected. The data, including the degree and the direction of the flat axis and the steep axis, Kappa angle and a variety of high order wave-front aberrations, were measured by SCHWIND and SIRIUS anterior segment analyzers. The average value of each parameter was taken 5 times, and paired sample t test was used and the data was analyzed by SPSS22.0 software.

    RESULTS: Flat axis degree and direction, steep axis degree and direction, coma, and trefoil were measured preoperatively and 1mo postoperatively by SCHWIND and by SIRIUS eye anterior segment analysis systems, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two machines(P>0.05). Kappa angle was measured 1mo postoperatively and there was no statistically significant differences(P>0.05). There was statistically significant difference(P<0.01)preoperatively between two machines of high-order aberrations and spherical aberration(SpAb); values measured by SCHWIND were higher than those measured by SIRIUS. There was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05)between two machines of high-order aberrations or SpAb in 1mo postoperatively.

    CONCLUSION: SCHWIND and SIRIUS anterior segment eye analysis system have a good consistency of wave-front aberration measurement before and after refractive surgery.

    Reference
    1李凤鸣. 中华眼科学(第2版). 北京:人民卫生出版社2005:2595-2596
    2李莹. 角膜近视屈光手术的安全性与信任度. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志2012; 9(14):513-516
    3 Hashemi H,Khabazkhoob M,Miraftab M,et al. Axial length to corneal radius of curvature ratio and refractive errors. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2013; 8(3):220-226
    4 Saw SM, Carkeet A, Chia KS, et al. Component dependent risk factors for ocular parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Ophthalmology 2002; 109(11):2065-2071
    5罗素荣,陈伟,李坊,等. Sirius角膜地形图系统与角膜曲率系统测量LASIK术前患者角膜曲率的一致性研究.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志2013; 15(3):181-184
    6 Savini G,Barboni P,Carbonelli M,et al. Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placidotopography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37(10):1809-1816
    7徐真,黄锦海,王勤美,等. 新型三维眼前节分析系统 Sirius和Pentacam测量准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术后眼前节参数的对比研究. 中华实验眼科杂志2013; 31(6):571-577
    8江媛,陈伟,陈增辉,等. 三维眼前节分析系统与超声生物显微镜测量急性原发性闭角型青光眼前房深度的一致性分析.中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志2013; 15(10):616-619
    9徐志芳,薛劲松,蒋沁,等. 近视眼LASIK术后角膜像差变化的临床观察. 眼科新进展 2006; 26(12):921-923
    10程亚辉,文诗伟,岳钟,等. Sirius测量LASEK术后前房形态的改变. 国际眼科杂志 2016; 16(12):2354-2355
    11 Bédard M, Martin NJ, Krueger P, et al. Assessing reproducibility of data obtained with instruments based on continuous measurements. Exp Aging Res 2000; 26(4):353-365
    12 Bland JM,Altnmn DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-310
    13邱岩,郑艳珍,翟国光,等. SIRIUS 3D角膜地形图在圆锥角膜诊断中的应用. 国际眼科杂志 2012; 12(6):1136-1138
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Xiao-Lan Zhang, Shun-Qing Wang, Cheng-Shu Sun,/et al.Consistency of two eye anterior segment analysis systems measuring wave-front aberration before and after refractive surgery. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2018;18(11):2016-2018

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1255
  • PDF: 1103
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:March 16,2018
  • Revised:September 25,2018
  • Online: October 22,2018