Application of optical coherence tomography in screening diabetic retinopathy in community
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [10]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the feasibility and significance of the application of optical coherence tomography(OCT)in screening diabetic retinopathy(DR)in community hospitals.

    METHODS: Retrospective analysis. A total of 378 cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Fushun, 184 males(193 eyes)and 194 females(207 eyes), aged from 43 to 76(averaged 59.0±9.7), were chosen in JiangJun community hospital. According to DR staging standard, 278 patients(300 eyes)with fundus changing were divided into 3 groups: DR1, DR2 and DR3. A total of 100 patients(100 eyes)with no fundus changing were as a control group. Spectralis OCT(Heidelberg, German)was used to scan retina of 3.4mm range around the optic disc with fast scanning mode and the thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer(RNFL)with different areas were recorded. Independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the difference of RNFL thickness in each group.

    RESULTS: The averaged thickness of RNFL in control, DR1, DR2, and DR3 group were 109.52±7.13μm, 108.51±7.09μm, 99.37±8.92μm and 98.48±8.57μm, respectively. Significant differences were found in the RNFL thickness between control group and DR 1-3 group(P<0.05). Comparison of the RNFL thickness in different areas: the distributions of RNFL thickness in control and DR groups were similar, where the RNFL in nasal and temporal optic disc was thinnest and superior and inferior temporal RNFL was thickest. There was statistic difference between the thinnest and thickest RNFL(P<0.05). The differences of the nasal, superior temporal and inferior nasal RNFL were found between DR1 group and control group(P<0.05); the differences of the nasal, superior temporal and inferior nasal RNFL were found between DR2 group and control group(P<0.05); the differences of RNFL in each area were found between DR3 group and control group(P<0.05). No difference of RNFL in each area was found between DR1 and DR2 group(P>0.05); the differences of RNFL in each area were found between DR1 and DR3 group(P<0.05)except temporal RNFL; the differences of RNFL in each area were found between DR2 and DR3 group(P<0.05)except temporal RNFL.

    CONCLUSION: The RNFL thickness is one of the sensitive indexes for early diagnosis of DR. The application of OCT in community hospitals for DR screening is helpful to the early prediction and the assessment of DR progression.

    Reference
    1徐瑜,毕宇芳,王卫庆,等.中国成人糖尿病流行与控制现状:2010年中国慢病监测暨糖尿病专题调查报告解读. 中华内分泌代谢杂志 2014; 30(3):184-186
    2胡善联,刘国恩,许樟荣,等.我国糖尿病流行病学和疾病经济负担研究现状.中国卫生经济2008; 27(8):5-8
    3 Ska M,Bernardes AB,Cardillo JA,et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness profile in normal eyes using third-generation optical coherence tomography. Eye 2006; 20(4):431-439
    4 Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs-an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.Ophthalmology 1991; 98(5 Suppl):786-806
    5第三届全国眼科学术会议.糖尿病视网膜病变分期标准.中华眼科杂志1985; 21(1-6):113-114
    6黎晓新.学习推广中国糖尿病视网膜病变防治指南,科学规范防治糖尿病视网膜病变.中华眼底病杂志2015; 31(2):117-120
    7 Chiharaa E,Sakugawaa M,Entania S.Reduced protein synthesis in diabetic retina and secondary reduction of slow axonal transport.Brain Res 1982; 250(2):363-366
    8 Wolter JR.Diabetic retinopathy.Am J Ophthalmol 1961; 51(4):1123-1141
    9马进,张怡,朱铁培,等.非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变视乳头旁视网膜神经纤维层改变及与视功能的相关研究.中华眼科杂志2013; 49(6):514-520
    10余臣祖,张朝宁,刘国安.实验性2型糖尿病动物模型研究进展.医学综述2006; 12(1):41-42
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Dong Li, Rui-Qing Wang, Xue-Zheng Liu. ,/et al.Application of optical coherence tomography in screening diabetic retinopathy in community. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2016;16(12):2276-2278

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:July 27,2016
  • Revised:November 02,2016
  • Online: November 23,2016