Clinical observation on different nucleus delivery methods in small incision cataract surgery with non-phacoemulsification
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [12]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the clinical effect and characteristics of lens loop extracting nucleus method, water irrigation and nucleus fragmentation within anterior chamber in small incision cataract surgery with non-phacoemulsification.

    METHODS:There were 324 cases(324 eyes)with senile cataract randomly divided into three groups, by the lens loop extracting nucleus method(group A), water irrigation(group B)and nucleus fragmentation within anterior chamber(group C), to complete the process of nucleus division. The time of nuclear removal, complication during operation, the degree of edema of corneal endothelium on the first day after the surgery and visual acuity after surgery were observed and recorded.

    RESULTS:The average extracting nucleus time was 45s in lens loop(group A); 34s in water irrigation(group B)and 65s in manual fragmentation(group C).The differences of average time are statistically significant(P<0.05), and the complications in lens loop and manual fragmentation mainly are iris trauma and posterior capsular rupture; the complication in the water irrigation is hyphema. Regarding corneal edema from 0 to 1degree, the difference between group A and group B, group B and group C were statistically significant(P<0.05). The difference between group A and group C had no statistical significance(P>0.05).Regarding the visual acuity on the first day after surgery, the difference between group A and group C, group B and group C were statistically significant(P<0.05), The visual acuity on the 7th day after surgery: the difference between group B and group C were statistically significant(P<0.05). In terms of the visual acuity on 1 momth after surgery: three groups have no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).

    CONCLUSION:Manual fragmentation has obvious advantages in removing nuclear above Ⅳ grade; The water irrigation method has fewer complications with low incidence of corner edema, which is more preferable in removing the nuclear below Ⅳ grade.

    Reference
    1张效房,吕勇,马静,等.介绍一种小切口非超声乳化人工晶状体植入手术.眼外伤职业眼病杂志 2000; 22(5):501-502
    2胡小松,陶黎明.白内障小切口非超声乳化与超声乳化摘出手术的临床疗效观察.眼外伤职业眼病杂志 2008; 30(5):395-397
    3 Gogate P,Deshpande M, Nirmalan PK.Why do phacoemulsification? Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive.Ophthalmology 2007; 114(5):965-968
    4何守志.白内障摘除手术及人工晶状体研究进展.中华眼科杂志 2005; 41:706
    5汪氡伍.小切口注水晶状体圈套出法娩核白内障非超声乳化摘除术临床分析.内蒙古中医药2009; 28(7):26-27
    6 Emery JM, Little JH. Phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataract.london:Mosby 1993:303-325
    7任洁.硬核白内障行小切口非超声乳化人工晶状体植入.国际眼科杂志2008; 8(9):1949-1950
    8谢立信,姚瞻,黄钰森,等.超声乳化白内障吸除术后角膜内皮细胞损伤和修复的研究.中华眼科杂志 2004; 40(2):90-93
    9 Davson H,ed.The Eye.VOLB; Oroudo:Academic press In 1984:75-89
    10 Greenk O,Livingston V,Bowman K, et al.Chlorhexidine effects on corneal endothelium and endothelium.Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98:1273-1278
    11范伟杰,鲍宁,陶黎明,等.手法小切口白内障术中后囊膜破裂原因及处理.眼外伤职业眼病杂志 2006; 28(4):259-261
    12何守志.重视防治并发症提高白内障手术质量.中华眼科杂志 2000; 36:325-326
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Wen-Jiang Liao, Ya-Hong Yan, Xian-Sheng Liu,/et al.Clinical observation on different nucleus delivery methods in small incision cataract surgery with non-phacoemulsification. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2013;13(11):2196-2198

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1689
  • PDF: 1258
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:August 06,2013
  • Revised:October 17,2013
  • Online: October 28,2013