Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of GDxVCC, SWAP and SAP in the early diagnosis of open angle glaucoma
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of GDxVCC, short wavelength automated perimetry(SWAP), standard automated perimetry(SAP)indices in the early diagnosis of open angle glaucoma.

    METHODS: Forty-two normal subjects(42 eyes), 84 patients with open angle glaucoma(OAG, 84 eyes)were examined with GDxVCC, SWAP and SAP. Receiver's operating characteristic(ROC)curves of RNFL parameters were described and compared. The sensitivity and specificity of GDxVCC, SAP and SWAP on glaucoma diagnosis were calculated.

    RESULTS: The area under ROC curve of GDxVCC parameters were: NFI(0.87), IES(0.85), IA(0.80), TSNIT(0.77), SA(0.76)respectively. The sensitivity of GDxVCC, SWAP, SAP were 80.6%, 74.2%, 67.8% respectively, and the specificity were 95.2%, 85.7%, 76.2% respectively.

    CONCLUSION: NFI and IES are the best indices to distinguish normal subjects from patients with glaucoma. GDxVCC has the best diagnostic capability, SWAP is the second.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Qing Zhang, Xiao-Bo Xia, Ping-Bao Wang. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of GDxVCC, SWAP and SAP in the early diagnosis of open angle glaucoma. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2013;13(3):466-469

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:November 06,2012
  • Revised:February 20,2013
  • Adopted:
  • Online:
  • Published: