Comparison of postoperative visual acuity between two TECNIS multifocal intraocular lenses with different collocations
Author:
Fund Project:

Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program(No.20200801026GH); Jilin Provincial Health Technology Innovation Project(No.2020J038)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [17]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the effect of different lens combinations on visual acuity, visual quality and patient satisfaction by comparing mixed implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00(ZXR00)and Tecnis ZMB00(ZMB00)lenses, bilateral implantation of ZMB00 lenses, and bilateral implantation of ZXR00 lenses.

    METHODS:This retrospective case-control study included 117 patients with cataracts(234 eyes)who underwent phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens(IOLs)implantation from August 2020 to December 2021. The 3 groups included 36 patients(72 eyes)who underwent bilateral implantation of ZXR00(RR group), 37 patients(74 eyes)who underwent bilateral implantation of ZMB00(MM group), and 44 patients(88 eyes)who underwent implantation with a combination of ZXR00 and ZMB00(MR group). The uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA, 5 m), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity(UIVA, 80 cm), uncorrected near visual acuity(UNVA, 40 cm), corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA), defocus curve, stereopsis and VF-14 and QoV visual quality scale of the patients in the three groups were assessed at 3-month follow-up.

    RESULTS:Bilateral UNVA in the MM and MR group were significantly better than that in the RR group(P<0.05). Bilateral UIVA was the best in the RR group. There were no significant differences in bilateral UDVA, CDVA and stereopsis among the groups(P>0.05). Values for near-stereoscopic acuity at 40 cm were 107.27±80.53, 105.67±83.79, and 108.69±97.66(20-400)arcsec in the MR, MM, and RR groups, respectively(P>0.05). Satisfaction rates exceeded 90% in all groups.

    CONCLUSION:All groups achieved good distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity and near-stereoscopic vision postoperatively. Mixed implantation with ZXR00 and ZMB00 lenses achieved excellent full-range vision and resulted in high satisfaction. These results may aid in developing individualized clinical treatment plans.

    Reference
    \〖1\〗 Liu X, Song XH, Wang W, et al. Comparison of the clinical outcomes between echelette extended range of vision and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. J Ophthalmol, 2019,2019:5815040.
    \〖2\〗 Martinez-Perez C, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Villa-Collar C, et al. Citation network analysis of the various types of multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, 2021,96(10):527-544.
    \〖3\〗 Brar S, Ganesh S, Arra RR, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction following implantation of monofocal IOL in one eye and ERV IOL in the contralateral eye with mini-monovision. Clin Ophthalmol, 2021,15:1839-1849.
    \〖4\〗 Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes following bilateral implantation of extended range of vision intraocular lens with micromonovision. J Ophthalmol, 2018,2018:7321794.
    \〖5\〗 Ye LY, Chen TY, Hu ZX, et al. Comparison of the visual performance between Oculentis MF30 and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses. Ann Transl Med, 2021,9(2):144.
    \〖6\〗 Choi SH, Lee HK, Yoon CH, et al. Visual performance after a unilateral or bilateral implantation of enlarged depth-of-focus intraocular lens in patients with cataract: a prospective clinical trial. J Ophthalmol, 2019,2019:2163809.
    \〖7\〗 Sudhir RR, Dey A, Bhattacharrya S, et al. AcrySof IQ PanOptix intraocular lens versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens and trifocal intraocular lens: a clinical overview. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol, 2019,8(4):335-349.
    \〖8\〗 Zhu YN, Zhong YY, Fu YY. The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res, 2022,2(1):100042.
    \〖9\〗 Pedrotti E, Carones F, Aiello F, et al. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: Monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2018,44(2):156-167.
    \〖10\〗 Song JE, Khoramnia R, Son HS, et al. Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal IOL and mix-and-match implantation of a bifocal IOL and an extended depth of focus IOL. J Refract Surg, 2020,36(8):528-535.
    \〖11\〗 de Medeiros AL, de Araújo Rolim AG, Motta AFP, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol, 2017,11:1911-1916.
    \〖12\〗 Kim S, Yi R, Chung SH. Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes of mix-and-match implantation of an extended depth-of-focus and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. Eye Contact Lens, 2022,48(6):261-266.
    \〖13\〗 Lan Q, Xu F, Sun T, et al. Comparison of binocular visual quality in six treatment protocols for bilateral cataract surgery with presbyopia correction: a prospective two-center single-blinded cohort study. Ann Med, 2023,55(2):2258894.
    \〖14\〗 Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hirata A, et al. Short-term outcomes of combined implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with different addition power. Acta Ophthalmol, 2015,93(4):e287-e293.
    \〖15\〗 Bissen-Miyajima H, Ota Y, Nakamura K, et al. Binocular visual function with staged implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with three add powers. Am J Ophthalmol, 2019,199:223-229.
    \〖16\〗 Li ZH, Xu WQ, Ye Z. The importance of neuroadaptation after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, 2021,57(1):6-10.
    \〖17\〗 Koo OS, Kang JW, Park JK, et al. Visual performance and patient satisfaction after implantation of extended range-of-vision IOLs: bilateral implantation vs 2 different mix-and-match approaches. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2021,47(2):192-197.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Li Tong, Li Fuqiang, Che Songtian,/et al.Comparison of postoperative visual acuity between two TECNIS multifocal intraocular lenses with different collocations. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2024;24(6):842-847

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:263
  • PDF: 564
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:September 20,2023
  • Revised:February 23,2024
  • Online: May 22,2024