Home > Archive>Volume 19, Issue 2, 2019 >179-187. DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.2.01
HTML XML Export Cite reminder
The patient-reported outcome of age-related cataract using Catquest-8SF questionnaire
Author:
Fund Project:

Supported by the Tai'an City Science and Technology Planning Program(No.2017NS0156); the High-School Scientific Research Development Program of Shandong Province(No.2016J16LL57); the Natural Scientific Foundation of Shandong Province(No.ZR2014CL011)

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [27]
    • |
  • Related [20]
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To assess the patient-reported outcome of phacoemulsification with posterior chamber single focus foldable intraocular lens(SIOL)using the Chinese version of Catquest-8SF questionnaire. We would mainly evaluate the applicability of Catquest-8SF scale in northern Chinese and evaluate its sensitivity to cataract surgery.

    METHODS:Prospective clinical case follow-up study. The patients were recruited from The Central Hospital of Tai'an and completed the Catquest-8SF questionnaire by face-to-face interviews before and 3mo after surgery at the hospital.

    RESULTS: A total of 120 cataract patients completed the Catquest-8SF at baseline. The preoperative score of the Catquest-8SF-CN had a significant negative correlation with preoperative binocular mean weighted logMAR visual acuity and age(P<0.05), while a significant positive correlation with education level(P<0.001). The patients without systemic comorbidities got higher score than those who with(P<0.05). Three months after surgery, 102(85%)patients came for follow-up and completed the questionnaire. Significant improvement of visual acuity was observed in both binocular and monocular surgery groups(t=10.404, P<0.001). There was higher improvement in binocular weighted logMAR visual acuity of binocular surgery group than in monocular surgery group(P<0.001). The postoperative score were significantly higher in both groups than before(P<0.001). There was a significant improvement in the total score after cataract surgery. Ninety-four patients(92.2%)were very satisfied or satisfied with the operation. The degree of satisfaction was significantly correlated with the improvement score of the scale and it was also correlated with their expectation of the surgery.

    CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of Catquest-8SF questionnaire is suitable for the age-related cataract population in northern China. It is highly responsive to cataract surgery and brief, so it may have the potential to become part of a routine clinical assessment for cataract surgery in China.

    Reference
    1 Ge J. Ophthalmology. People's Medical Publishing House 2010; 209
    2 Zou HD. The problems and challenges in the current eye health management in China. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 53(7):481-483
    3 Lundström M, Barry P, Henry Y, Rosen P, Stenevi U. Visual outcome of cataract surgery; study from the European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39(5):673-679
    4 Lundström M, Goh PP, Henry Y, Salowi MA, Barry P, Manning S, Rosen P, Stenevi U. The changing pattern of cataract surgery indications. Ophthalmology 2015; 122(1):31-38
    5 Mönestam E. Long-term outcomes of cataract surgery: 15-year results of a prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42(1):19-26
    6 Hahn U, Krummenauer F, Kölbl B, Neuhann T, Schayan-Araghi K, Schmickler S, von Wolff K, Josef W, Will T, Neuhann I. Determination of valid benchmarks for outcome indicators in cataract surgery; a multicenter, prospective cohort trial. Ophthalmology 2011; 11(118):2105-2112
    7 Colin J, El Kebir S, Eydoux E, Hoang-Xuan T, Rozot P, Weiser M. Assessment of patient satisfaction with outcomes of and ophthalmic care for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36(8):1373-1379
    8 Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Questionnaires for measuring cataract surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37(5):945-959
    9 McAlinden C, Gothwal VK, Khadka J, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology 2011; 118(12):2374-2381
    10 Khadka J, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90(8):720-744
    11 Fung SSM, Luis J, Hussain B, Bunce C, Hingorani M, Hancox J. Patient-reported outcome measuring tools in cataract surgery: Clinical comparison at a tertiary hospital. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42(12):1759-1767
    12 Khadka J, Huang JH, Chen HS, Chen CW, Gao RR, Bao FJ, Zhang SF, Wang QM, Pesudovs K. Assessment of cataract surgery outcome using the modified catquest short-form instrument in China. PLoS One 2016; 11(10):e0164182
    13 Huang JH, Chen HS, Gao RR, Zhang SF, Bao FJ, Wang QM. Development and assessment of a revised Chinese version of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire for a Chinese cataract population. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 17(7):402-406
    14 Li JJ, Zhao JY, He MG. Meeting minutes of Chinese medical association ophthalmology branch cataract group in 2010. Journal of Practical Preventing Blind 2011; 06(1):23-24
    15 Holladay JT. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30(2):287-290
    16 Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976; 53:740-745
    17 Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35(3):504-513
    18 Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest questionnaire: Re-validation in an Australian cataract population. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 37(8):785-794
    19 Sach TH, Foss AJE, Gregson RM, Zaman A, Osborn F, Masud T, Harwood RH. Second-eye cataract surgery in elderly women: a cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial. Eye 2010; 24(2):276-283
    20 Zuo L, Zhang JH, Zou HD, Fu HQ, Fei XF, Xu WQ. Impact of monocular or binocular cataract surgery on vision health related quality of life. Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University 2012; 32(11):1501-1505
    21 Pager CK. Expectations and outcomes in cataract surgery: a prospective test of 2 models of satisfaction. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122(12):1788-1792
    22 Garcia-Gutierrez S, Quintana JM, Aguire U, Barrio I, Hayas CL, Gonzalez N. Impact of clinical and patient-reported outcomes on patient satisfaction with cataract extraction. Health Expect 2014; 17(6):765-775
    23 Pager CK. Randomised controlled trial of preoperative information to improve satisfaction with cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89(1):10-13
    24 Tipotsch-Maca SM, Varsits RM, Ginzel C, Vecsei-Marlovits PV. Effect of a multimedia-assisted informed consent procedure on the information gain, satisfaction, and anxiety of cataract surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42(1):110-116
    25 Chen LX. Analysis of postoperative patients' satisfaction of phacoemulsification. Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma & Occupational Eye Disease 2007; 29(5):333-335
    26 Chen ZY, Lin XC, Qu B, Gao WY, Zuo YJ, Peng WY, Jin L, Yu MB, Lamoureux E. Preoperative expectations and postoperative outcomes of visual functioning among cataract patients in urban southern China. PLoS One 2017; 12(1):e0169844
    27 Mokashi A, Leatherbarrow B, Kincey J, Slater R, Hillier V, Mayer S. Patient communication during cataract surgery. Eye 2004; 18(2):147-151
    Cited by
Get Citation

Sheng-Xia Wang, Xin Liu, Yun-Hong Du,/et al.The patient-reported outcome of age-related cataract using Catquest-8SF questionnaire. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2019;19(2):179-187

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:February 03,2018
  • Revised:October 29,2018
  • Online: January 17,2019
You are the  Visitors
Governing Body：Department of Health, Provincial Government of Shaanxi, China
Organizer：Xi'an Medical Association of China
Address：Room 11707-08, Building 2, Unit 1, Wanda Plaza, No.8 Yanta North Road, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
Fax：(8629)82245172 Phone：(+8629)82245172/82210956
Email：ijopress@163.com
® 2025 All Rights Reserved   The terms of CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 are applicable to all open access content.