Vitrectomy combine with double membranes peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81360154)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To explore the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy combine with internal limiting membrane peeling and epiretinal membranes peeling in the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membrane(IERM).

    METHODS: In this retrospective study, 53 patients(53 eyes)who underwent vitrectomy for IERM from January 2015 to December 2015 were evaluated, with 24-month follow-up. Only removal of the epiretinal membrane(ERM group)was performed in 21 patients, while 32 had removal of the epiretinal membrane associated with internal limiting membrane peeling(ERM+ILM group). The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central macular thickness(CMT)and the complications were observed and analyzed before operation, 1, 3, 12, 24mo after operation.

    RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement of BCVA when compared to preoperative BCVA(P<0.05). In ERM group the BCVA before and 1, 3, 12 and 24mo after operation were 0.676±0.137,0.576±0.099, 0.551±0.085, 0.514±0.077, 0.506±0.032, and in ERM+ILM group were 0.659±0.132, 0.582±0.111, 0.578±0.101, 0.523±0.062, 0.511±0.081. The comparison between the two groups at 1, 3,12 and 24mo after surgery were no significant differences(P>0.05). After operation, statistically significant CMT reduction occurred in both groups(P<0.05). In ERM group the preoperative and postoperative CMT were 461.14±13.477μm, 402.36±11.346μm, 368.52±13.216μm, 325.24±8.246μm, 273.29±8.973μm, and in ERM+ILM group were 462.47±14.287μm, 414.72±9.237μm, 373.44±8.328μm, 328.94±6.923μm, 274.28±8.340μm. There were no significant difference between the two groups at 1, 3, 12 and 24 after operation(P>0.05). There were 3 cases(3 eyes)had retinal punctate hemorrhage after operation, of which 1(5%)was from the ERM group and 2(6%)were from the ERM+ILM group. No significant difference was observed between the groups(P=1.000). At the end of follow-up, 4 cases(19%)presented with recurrence of the epiretinal membrane all from the ERM group, and there no recurrence was found in ERM+ILM group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.020).

    CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy with ILM peeling and epiretinal membranes peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane is the efficacy and safety, and it may reduce the recurrence.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Xiao-Qin Yang, Tuo Li. Vitrectomy combine with double membranes peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2018;18(11):2011-2015

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:June 15,2018
  • Revised:September 20,2018
  • Adopted:
  • Online: October 22,2018
  • Published: