Effect on the treatment of congenital ptosis in two kinds of operation method
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM:To compare the functional and cosmetic effects of two different surgical techniques for congenital ptosis.

    METHODS: The patients were divided into four groups according to the operation method: Patients undertook bilateral fascial suspension surgery as Group A(42 eyes of 21 cases); Patients undertook bilateral levator muscle shortening surgery as Group B(38 eyes of 19 cases); Patients undertook unilateral fascial suspension surgery as Group C(24 eyes of 24 cases); Patients undertook unilateral levator muscle shortening surgery as Group D(29 eyes of 29 cases). Each group patients were followed for postoperative function and appearance effect.

    RESULTS: 1)Early postoperative of two operation function success rate was up to 100%, the function of levator muscle shortening surgery was 97.01% in the late postoperative, was higher than bilateral fascial suspension surgery(87.88%), with statistical difference in both surgerys(P<0.05). 2)Appearance effect of two kinds of operation method in early postoperative had no statistical difference(P >0.05); In the late postoperative, the mean grades for “Lid Contour” and “Lid Crease” of Group B were better than that of Group A(P<0.01). While the mean grades for “Lid Contour”, “Symmetry of Lid Height” and “Lid Crease” of Group D were similarly better than that of Group C(P<0.01).

    CONCLUSION: Two kinds of operation method have good effects on the treatment of congenital ptosis. In terms of cosmetic effect, levator muscle shortening surgery is better.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Yun-Jia Jiang, Song Sun, Ting-Ting Zhu. Effect on the treatment of congenital ptosis in two kinds of operation method. Guoji Yanke Zazhi( Int Eye Sci) 2014;14(12):2274-2276

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:August 08,2014
  • Revised:November 26,2014
  • Adopted:
  • Online: December 02,2014
  • Published: