Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia correction
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Hua Wang. Center for Ophthalmic Optics, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital; the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China. wanghuaeye@163.com

Fund Project:

Supported by the Research Grant of Hunan Provincial Health Commission Project (No.C2017037).

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [24]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare clinical outcomes and refractive stability of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for high myopia correction. METHODS: The Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes objectively after operation for high myopia correction. We compared the two procedures in terms of 1-year changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), safety index, efficacy index, spherical equivalent, modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, strehl ratio (SR) and objective scatter index (OSI). RESULTS: At 1y postoperatively, the safety indices were 1.33±0.27 in ICL group, and 1.17±0.24 in FS-LASIK group. 39.58% in the ICL group and 27.59% in the FS-LASIK group gained CDVA in 2 lines or better than that in preoperative CDVA. The efficacy indices were 1.28±0.22 in ICL group, and 1.13±0.26 in FS-LASIK group. The changes of spherical equivalent from 1wk to 1y postoperatively was -0.12±0.37 D in ICL group, and -0.79±0.58 D in FS-LASIK group (P<0.05). Spherical equivalent within ±0.50 D was achieved in 97.92% in ICL group and 68.97% in FS-LASIK group. MTF cutoff frequency were higher with ICL as compared to FS-LASIK (P<0.05) at each postoperative follow-up stage; for postoperative 1mo later, SR was statistically significant difference between two groups (P<0.05); with no statistically significant difference in OSI between two groups (P>0.05) in postoperative 3mo later. CONCLUSION: ICL implantation and FS-LASIK procedures both provide good safety and predictability in high myopia correction. ICL implantation provides better clinical outcomes and refractive stability than FS-LASIK.

    Reference
    1 Prakash G, Srivastava D, Suhail M. Femtosecond laser-assisted wavefront-guided LASIK using a newer generation aberrometer: 1-year results. J Refract Surg 2015;31(9):600-606.
    2 Binder PS. Risk factors for ectasia after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(12):2010-2011.
    3 Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kitazawa Y, Kojima T, Nakamura T, Oka Y, Matsumoto R. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102(2):177-181.
    4 Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou X. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol 2018;18(1):141.
    5 Yan ZP, Miao HM, Zhao F, Wang XY, Chen X, Li MY, Zhou XT. Two-year outcomes of visian implantable collamer lens with a central hole for correcting high myopia. J Ophthalmol 2018;2018:8678352.
    6 Niu LL, Miao HM, Han T, Ding L, Wang XY, Zhou XT. Visual outcomes of Visian ICL implantation for high myopia in patients with shallow anterior chamber depth. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19(1):121.
    7 Martínez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC, Aguirre M, Pujol J. Effects of aging on optical quality and visual function. Clin Exp Optom 2016;99(6):518-525.
    8 Tan QQ, Lin J, Tian J, Liao X, Lan CJ. Objective optical quality in eyes with customized selection of aspheric intraocular lens implantation. BMC Ophthalmol 2019;19(1):152.
    9 Chen T, Yu F, Lin HY, Zhao YY, Chang PJ, Lin L, Chen Q, Zheng Q, Zhao YE, Lu F, Li J. Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case-control observational study. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100(11):1530-1535.
    10 McAlinden C. Corneal refractive surgery: past to present. Clin Exp Optom 2012;95(4):386-398.
    11 Lee JK, Chuck RS, Park CY. Femtosecond laser refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;26(4):260-264.
    12 Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Domínguez-Vicent A, García-Lázaro S, Montés-Micó R. Optical and visual quality of the visian implantable collamer lens using an adaptive-optics visual simulator. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155(3):499-507.e1.
    13 Pérez-Vives C, Domínguez-Vicent A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Pons áM, Montés-Micó R. Optical quality of the Visian implantable collamer lens for different refractive powers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251(5):1423-1429.
    14 Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable contact lens and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Cornea 2003;22(4):324-331.
    15 Sanders DR. Matched population comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens and standard LASIK for myopia of -3.00 to -7.88 diopters. J Refract Surg 2007;23(6):537-553.
    16 Pérez-Vives C, Dominguez-Vicent A, García-Lázaro S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R. Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable Collamer lens and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using an adaptive optics visual simulator. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012:0.
    17 Marcos S, Barbero S, Llorente L, Merayo-Lloves J. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42(13):3349-3356.
    18 Gatinel D, Adam PA, Chaabouni S, Munck J, Thevenot M, Hoang-Xuan T, Pieger S, Fujieda M, Bains HS. Comparison of corneal and total ocular aberrations before and after myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 2010;26(5):333-340.
    19 Sarver EJ, Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Image quality in myopic eyes corrected with laser in situ keratomileusis and phakic intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2003;19(4):397-404.
    20 Malecaze FJ, Hulin H, Bierer P, Fournié P, Grandjean H, Thalamas C, Guell JL. A randomized paired eye comparison of two techniques for treating moderately high myopia: LASIK and artisan phakic lens. Ophthalmology 2002;109(9):1622-1630.
    21 Ambrósio R, Tervo T, Wilson SE. LASIK-associated dry eye and neurotrophic epitheliopathy: pathophysiology and strategies for prevention and treatment. J Refract Surg 2008;24(4):396-407.
    22 Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, Siganos CS, Theodorakis MA, Pallikaris AI. Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28(10):1737-1741.
    23 Dong ZX, Zhou XT, Wu JH, Zhang ZH, Li T, Zhou ZM, Zhang SH, Li G. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98(2):263-269.
    24 Mok KH, Lee VW. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations. J Refract Surg 2005;21(2):141-143.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Zheng Jiang, Hua Wang, Dong-Qiang Luo,/et al.Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia correction. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021,14(5):737-743

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:January 09,2020
  • Revised:January 29,2021
  • Online: March 29,2021