Mathematical analysis of corneal remodelling after intracorneal ring surgery in keratoconus
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [20]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To represent mathematically the intersection between the ectatic corneal geometry and the plane of intracorneal ring implants (ICRS) in order to determine the corneal response to ICRS surgery in keratoconus (KC). Thereafter, to present the concept and early results of a newly derived topography-guided nomogram for ICRS surgery for the treatment of keratectasia. METHODS: The corneal rings plane intersection was modelled to a conic section. Ring effect was the result of: the ring size, position (steep vs flat), location (distance from the geometric centre of the cornea), and the discrepancy between the ring’s curvature and the tunnel’s curvature. Femtosecond laser was used to create the tunnels and the incision sites were chosen according to the nomogram in order to place the thickest ring in the steepest portion of the cornea regardless of the astigmatism axis of refraction. RESULTS: The conic section had a more prolate shape in the steep area of the cornea than in the flat area, depending on the corneal sagittal curvature. Equal ring size had more flattening effect in the steep area than in the flat area. Thick segment should be implanted under the steep portion of the cornea regardless of the cylinder axis of refraction. Single segment in the steep area was sufficient in early and moderate cases of KC. The new nomogram provided more topographic regularity with significant reduction of astigmatism and better improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) than the conventional nomogram. CONCLUSION: The newly derived nomogram can produce better results than the conventional nomogram. Moreover, based on this concept, a new nomogram can be integrated into the femtosecond laser software to create topography-guided, customized, elliptical tunnels with modified focal asphericity that allows for customized focal flattening of the irregularly steepened ectatic cornea.

    Reference
    1 Vegaestrada A, Alio JL. The use of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016;3(1):8.
    2 Carrasquillo KG, Rand J, Talamo JH. Intacs for keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia: mechanical versus femtosecond laser-assisted channel creation. Cornea 2007;26(8):956-962.
    3 Ertan A, Bahadir M. Intrastromal ring segment insertion using a femtosecond laser to correct pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(10):1710-1716.
    4 Rabinowitz YS, Li X, Ignacio TS, Maguen E. INTACS inserts using the femtosecond laser compared to the mechanical spreader in the treatment of keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2006;22(8):764-771.
    5 Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM, Krueger RR. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2003;19(2):94-103.
    6 Daxer A. Biomechanics of corneal ring implants. Cornea 2015;34(11):1493-1498.
    7 Hellstedt T, Mäkelä J, Uusitalo R, Emre S, Uusitalo R. Treating keratoconus with intacs corneal ring segments. J Refract Surg 2005;21(3):236-246.
    8 Alió JL, Artola A, Hassanein A, Haroun H, Galal A. One or 2 Intacs segments for the correction of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(5):943-953.
    9 Levinger S, Pokroy R. Keratoconus managed with intacs: one-year results. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123(10):1308-1314.
    10 Kanellopoulos AJ, Pe LH, Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Modified intracorneal ring segment implantations (INTACS) for the management of moderate to advanced keratoconus: efficacy and complications. Cornea 2006;25(1):29-33.
    11 Colin J, Malet FJ. Intacs for the correction of keratoconus: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33(1):69-74.
    12 Piñero DP, Alio JL, Teus MA, Barraquer RI, Uceda-Montañés A. Modeling the intracorneal ring segment effect in keratoconus using refractive, keratometric, and corneal aberrometric data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(11):5583-5591.
    13 Shetty R, D’Souza S, Ramachandran S, Kurian M, Nuijts RM. Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:23-28.
    14 Taylor, Charles. An introduction to the ancient and modern geometry of conics, page 196 (“focal spheres”), pages 204-205 (history of discovery) Deighton, Bell and co., 1881. In.
    15 Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Cinar Y, Koytak A, Kurnaz E, Piñero DP, Ozerturk Y. A single 210-degree arc length intrastromal corneal ring implantation for the management of pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150(2):185-192.e1.
    16 Israel M, Yousif MO, Osman NA, Nashed M, Abdelfattah NS. Keratoconus correction using a new model of intrastromal corneal ring segments. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;42(3):444-454.
    17 Alió JL, Shabayek MH. Intracorneal asymmetrical rings for keratoconus: where should the thicker segment be implanted? J Refract Surg 2006;22(3):307-309.
    18 Coskunseven E, Kymionis G, Jankov II M. Complications of intra corneal ring segment implantation with femtosecond laser channel creation in patients with keratoconus (explanations and solutions). J Emmetropia 2010;1:221-228.
    19 Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, Tuft SJ. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye Lond Engl 2014;28(2):189-195.
    20 Fadlallah A, Dirani A, El Rami H, Cherfane G, Jarade E. Safety and visual outcome of Visian toric ICL implantation after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2013;29(2):84-89.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Elias F. Jarade, Elise Slim, Carole Cherfan,/et al.Mathematical analysis of corneal remodelling after intracorneal ring surgery in keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol, 2017,10(3):348-354

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1362
  • PDF: 730
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:June 25,2016
  • Revised:December 05,2016
  • Online: March 14,2017