Comparison of Diaton transpalpebral tonometer with applanation tonometry in keratoconus
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the added value of using a Diaton transpalpebral tonometer (DT) to measure IOP in keratoconus. Most type of tonometers use corneal applanation or biomechanical resistance to measure intraocular pressure (IOP); however, these factors can be altered by keratoconus. Specifically, we examined whether DT can detect false-negative low Goldmann applanation tonometry (AT) measurements. METHODS: Patients with keratoconus were recruited from our tertiary academic treatment center. Measurements included AT and DT (in random order) and Scheimpflug imaging. An age- and gender-matched group of control subjects with no history of corneal disease or glaucoma was also recruited. RESULTS: In total, 130 eyes from 66 participants were assessed. In the keratoconus group, mean AT was 11.0 ± 2.6, mean DT 11.2±5.5 (P=0.729), and the two measures were correlated significantly (P=0.006, R=0.323). However, a Bland-Altman plot revealed a wide distribution and poor agreement between both measurements. Previous corneal crosslinking, corneal pachymetry, and Krumeich classification had no effect on measured IOP. CONCLUSION: Measurements obtained using a Diaton tonometer are not affected by corneal biomechanics; however, its poor agreement with Goldmann AT values calls into question the added value of using a Diaton tonometer to measure IOP in keratoconus.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Robert PL Wisse, Natalie Peeters, Saskia M Imhof, et al. Comparison of Diaton transpalpebral tonometer with applanation tonometry in keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol, 2016,9(3):395-398

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:January 23,2015
  • Revised:June 10,2015
  • Adopted:
  • Online: March 11,2016
  • Published: