Ocular biomechanical measurements on post-keratoplasty corneas using a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [21]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To analyse ocular biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in post-keratoplasty eyes, as compared to normal subjects, with a new Scheimpflug-based technology. Moreover, biomechanical data were correlated with the size and age of the donor and recipient corneas. METHODS: Measurements were conducted on 46 eyes of 46 healthy patients without any corneal pathology (age: 53.83±20.8y) and 30 eyes of 28 patients after penetrating keratoplasty (age: 49.43±21.34y). Ten biomechanical parameters, the CCT and IOP were recorded by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology (CorVis ST) using high-speed Scheimpflug imaging. Keratometry values were also recorded using Pentacam HR system. Scheimpflug measurements were performed after 43.41±40.17mo (range: 11-128mo) after the keratoplasty and after 7.64±2.34mo (range: 5-14mo) of suture removal. RESULTS: Regarding the device-specific biomechanical parameters, the highest concavity time and radius values showed a significant decrease between these two groups (P=0.01 and P<0.001). None of other biomechanical parameters disclosed a significant difference. The CCT showed a significant difference between post-keratoplasty eyes as compared to normal subjects (P=0.003) using the CorVis ST device. The IOP was within the normal range in both groups (P=0.84). There were no significant relationships between the keratometric data, the size of the donor and recipient, age of the donor and recipient and biomechanical properties obtained by CorVis ST. CONCLUSION: The ocular biomechanics remain stable after penetrating keratoplasty according to the CorVis ST measurements. Only two from the ten device-specific parameters have importance in the follow-up period after penetrating keratoplasty.

    Reference
    1 Soergel F, Jean B, Seiler T, Bende T, Mücke S, Pechhold W, Pels L. Dynamic mechanical spectroscopy of the cornea for measurement of its viscoelastic properties in vitro. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4(3):151-156.
    2 Kynigopoulos M, Schlote T, Kotecha A, Tzamalis A, Pajic B, Haefliger I. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2008;225(5):357-360.
    3 Moreno-Montanes J, Maldonado MJ, Garcia N, Mendiluce L, Garcia-Gomez PJ, Segui-Gomez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49(3):968-974.
    4 Chen S, Chen D, Wang J, Lu F, Wang Q, Qu J. Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2010;26(4):279-288.
    5 Ayala M. Corneal hysteresis in normal subjects and in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res 2011;46(4):187-191.
    6 Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cornea 2012;31(1):21-25.
    7 Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software. J Refract Surg 2011;27(6):452-457.
    8 Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(7):3026-3031.
    9 Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, Gatinel D. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(6):2912-2916.
    10 Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010;117(4):673-679.
    11 Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes. J Refract Surg 2011;27(3):209-215.
    12 Yenerel NM, Kucumen RB, Gorgun E. Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2010;29(11):1247-1251.
    13 Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68(5):835-844.
    14 Ayyala RS. Penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;45(2):91-105.
    15 Fabian ID, Barequet IS, Skaat A, Rechtman E, Goldenfeld M, Roberts CJ, Melamed S. Intraocular pressure measurements and biomechanical properties of the cornea in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151(5):774-781.
    16 Shin JY, Choi JS, Oh JY, Kim MK, Lee JH, Wee WR. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer. Korean J Ophthalmol 2010;24(3):139-142.
    17 Jafarinasab MR, Feizi S, Javadi MA, Hashemloo A. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Eye Res 2011;36(5):417-421.
    18 Hosny M, Hassaballa MA, Shalaby A. Changes in corneal biomechanics following different keratoplasty techniques. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:767-770.
    19 John T, Taylor DA, Shimmyo M, Siskowski BE. Corneal hysteresis following descemetorhexis with endokeratoplasty: early results. Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie) 2007;39(1):9-14.
    20 Laiquzzaman M, Tambe K, Shah S. Comparison of biomechanical parameters in penetrating keratoplasty and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyser. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010;38(8):758-763.
    21 Maeda N, Ueki R, Fuchihata M, Fujimoto H, Koh S, Nishida K. Corneal biomechanical properties in 3 corneal transplantation techniques with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2014;58(6):483-489.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Laszlo Modis Jr.,Ziad Hassan, Eszter Szalai,/et al.Ocular biomechanical measurements on post-keratoplasty corneas using a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device. Int J Ophthalmol, 2016,9(2):235-238

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1512
  • PDF: 672
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
Publication History
  • Received:August 23,2014
  • Revised:February 03,2015
  • Online: February 04,2016