Comparison of efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy with or without inner limiting membrane peeling on refractory macular edema in diabetes
DOI:
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Affiliation:

南京医科大学附属苏州医院,苏州市立医院 眼科

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on refractory macular edema in diabetes. Methods: Eighty patients with refractory macular edema in diabetes were retrospectively selected and assigned into groups according to the treatment method. Among them, 38 patients treated with PPV were included as group A, and 42 patients treated with PPV combined with ILM peeling were included as group B. The relevant data of patients in the two groups were collected and the efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular retinal thickness (CMT), and severity of macular edema in group B were all superior to those in group A (P<0.05). After surgery, the incidence of complications in group B was 11.90%, with no prominent difference compared to group A's 18.42% (P>0.05). Conclusion: PPV combined with or without ILM peeling can improve visual function and relieve macular edema in patients with refractory macular edema in diabetes. However, the combination of PPV and ILM peeling is superior to PPV alone in improving vision and relieving macular edema, and does not increase postoperative complications.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:January 19,2025
  • Revised:May 22,2025
  • Adopted:April 21,2025
  • Online: May 23,2025
  • Published: