两种TECNIS多焦点人工晶状体不同组合方式植入术后视力对比

Comparison of postoperative visual acuity between two TECNIS multifocal intraocular lenses with different collocations

摘要:

目的：对比双眼均植入Tecnis Symfony ZXR00(ZXR00)、双眼分别植入ZXR00和Tecnis ZMB00(ZMB00)以及双眼均植入ZMB00患者术后视力、视觉质量及患者满意度。

方法：回顾性病例对照研究。收集2020-08/2021-12行白内障超声乳化吸除联合人工晶状体(IOL)植入的白内障患者117例(234眼)，根据IOL不同分为三组：37例(74眼)双眼植入ZMB00为MM组； 44例(88眼)双眼分别植入ZXR00和ZMB00为MR组； 36例(72眼)双眼均植入ZXR00为RR组。观察三组患者术后3 mo裸眼远视力(UDVA，5 m)、裸眼中视力(UIVA，80 cm)、裸眼近视力(UNVA，40 cm)、矫正远视力(CDVA)、离焦曲线、立体视及VF-14、QoV视觉质量评分表问卷调查。

结果：MM和MR组UNVA优于RR组(P<0.05)； 而MM组与MR组不具有统计学差异。RR组UIVA最优。三组的UDVA、CDVA和立体视均不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。 术后3 mo时MR、MM、RR组40 cm近立体视锐度分别为107.27±80.53、105.67±83.79、108.69±97.66(20-400)弧秒(P>0.05)。MR、MM、RR组的满意度均达到90%以上。

结论：三组术后均具有良好的远、中、近视力和双眼近立体视。其中，MR组具有更优异的全程视力。三组患者术后满意度均较高，可以根据患者的不同需求选择合适的多焦点人工晶状体。

Abstract:

AIM: To investigate the effect of different lens combinations on visual acuity, visual quality and patient satisfaction by comparing mixed implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00(ZXR00)and Tecnis ZMB00(ZMB00)lenses, bilateral implantation of ZMB00 lenses, and bilateral implantation of ZXR00 lenses.

METHODS:This retrospective case-control study included 117 patients with cataracts(234 eyes)who underwent phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens(IOLs)implantation from August 2020 to December 2021. The 3 groups included 36 patients(72 eyes)who underwent bilateral implantation of ZXR00(RR group), 37 patients(74 eyes)who underwent bilateral implantation of ZMB00(MM group), and 44 patients(88 eyes)who underwent implantation with a combination of ZXR00 and ZMB00(MR group). The uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA, 5 m), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity(UIVA, 80 cm), uncorrected near visual acuity(UNVA, 40 cm), corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA), defocus curve, stereopsis and VF-14 and QoV visual quality scale of the patients in the three groups were assessed at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS:Bilateral UNVA in the MM and MR group were significantly better than that in the RR group(P<0.05). Bilateral UIVA was the best in the RR group. There were no significant differences in bilateral UDVA, CDVA and stereopsis among the groups(P>0.05). Values for near-stereoscopic acuity at 40 cm were 107.27±80.53, 105.67±83.79, and 108.69±97.66(20-400)arcsec in the MR, MM, and RR groups, respectively(P>0.05). Satisfaction rates exceeded 90% in all groups.

CONCLUSION:All groups achieved good distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity and near-stereoscopic vision postoperatively. Mixed implantation with ZXR00 and ZMB00 lenses achieved excellent full-range vision and resulted in high satisfaction. These results may aid in developing individualized clinical treatment plans.