康柏西普不同给药方案治疗DME的安全性和疗效评估
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No.82000768); 深圳市基础研究专项(深圳市自然科学基金)面上项目(No.JCYJ20210324113808023)


Safety and efficacy of different loading doses followed by pro re nata regimens of Conbercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82000768); General Program of Shenzhen Basic Research Program(Shenzhen Natural Science Foundation)(No.JCYJ20210324113808023)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:评估康柏西普采用连续3次每月注射后改用按需治疗方案(3+PRN)和连续5次每月注射后改用按需治疗方案(5+PRN)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的安全性和疗效。

    方法:回顾性病例对照研究。选取2019-12/2020-06期间于我院就诊的DME患者51例92眼纳入研究,据治疗方案分为3+PRN组(26例48眼)和5+PRN组(25例44眼)。治疗后至少随访12mo,观察两组患者最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心凹视网膜厚度(CMT)的变化情况,玻璃体腔注药次数及眼部不良事件发生率。

    结果:随访12mo,3+PRN组、5+PRN组患者平均注药次数无差异(7.24±0.91次 vs 7.56±1.04次,P=0.117)。治疗后3、6、9、12mo,两组患者BCVA和CMT均较治疗前改善(均P<0.05),且治疗后6、9、12mo,5+PRN组患者BCVA和CMT均优于3+PRN组(均P<0.05)。随访期间,两组患者均未发生严重不良事件,两组患者眼部不良事件总发生率均为27%,所有不良事件给予对症处理后均好转。

    结论:康柏西普3+PRN和5+PRN治疗方案均能安全有效地治疗DME,总注射次数相当,但5+PRN治疗方案较3+PRN治疗方案视力改善更佳,CMT下降更明显。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different Conbercept treatment on diabetic macular edema(DME)with 3+PRN and 5+PRN.

    METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. A total of 51 patients(92 eyes)with DME who were treated in our hospital during December 2019 and June 2020 were included, and they were divided into 3+PRN group with 26 cases(48 eyes)and 5+PRN group with 25 cases(44 eyes). All patients received monthly follow-up for 12mo and the changes of best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and central macular thickness(CMT), the number of intravitreal injections and the occurrence of complications were compared and observed in the two groups.

    RESULTS:After follow-up for 12mo, there was no difference in the average injection times between the 3+PRN group and the 5+PRN group(7.24±0.91 times vs. 7.56±1.04 times, P=0.117). The BCVA and CMT of the two groups improved at 3, 6, 9, and 12mo after treatment compared with those before treatment(all P<0.05), and the BCVA and CMT of the 5+PRN group were better than those of the 3+PRN group at 6, 9, and 12mo after treatment(all P<0.05). During the follow-up period, no serious adverse events occurred in the two groups of patients, and the total incidence of ocular adverse events in the two groups was 27%. All adverse events were improved after symptomatic treatment.

    CONCLUSION: Both the 3+PRN and 5+PRN treatment strategy of Conbercept can treat DME safely and effectively, the total times of injection were comparable. However, the BCVA and CMT improved more in the 5+PRN group than that in 3+PRN group.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孟婷,孙洪岩,罗彬,等.康柏西普不同给药方案治疗DME的安全性和疗效评估.国际眼科杂志, 2023,23(1):138-141.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-21
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码