方法：横断面研究。分别采用Goldmann眼压计、非接触式眼压计与Schiotz眼压计测量维吾尔族、汉族大学生眼压。比较两族整体间、同族不同性别间、不同眼别间三种眼压计测得的眼压值。

结果：相同眼压计对维吾尔族及汉族大学生眼压测量值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)； 相同眼压计对同族不同性别间眼压测量值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)； 相同眼压计对不同眼别间眼压测量值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，汉族学生比维吾尔族学生眼压测量值高(P<0.05)，非接触式眼压计比Goldmann眼压计眼压测量值偏高(P<0.05)，非接触式眼压计比Schiotz眼压计眼压测量值要小(P<0.05)。

结论：同一眼压测量仪对同族不同性别间及不同眼别间无差异，汉族学生比维吾尔族学生眼压测量值高，Schiotz眼压计眼压值测量结果显著高于非接触式眼压计，而非接触式眼压计眼压测量值高于Goldmann眼压计。

METHODS:This cross-sectional study measured the intraocular pressure of college students of Uyghur and Han with Goldmann tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Schiotz tonometer respectively; comparison was made in the intraocular pressure measurements between the two races, between the two genders in the same race, and between the right and left eyes by three different ophthalmotonometers.

RESULTS: The differences in intraocular pressure measurements by the same tonometer between college students of Uyghur and Han were statistically significant(P<0.05); the differences in the measurements between different genders in one race by the same tonometer were not statistically significant(P>0.05); the differences in the measurements between the right and left eyes with the same tonometer were not statistically significant(P>0.05); the intraocular pressure measurements of college students of Han were higher than that of college students of Uyghur(P<0.05); measurements by non-contact tonometer were higher than those by Goldmann tonometer(P<0.05); measurements by non-contact tonometer were lower than those by Schiotz tonometer(P<0.05).

CONCLUSION: There are no differences in the measurements between the two genders and between the right and left eyes by the same tonometer; the measurements of college students of Han are higher than those of college students of Uyghur; measurements by Schiotz tonometer are significantly higher than those by non-contact tonometer; measurements by non-contact tonometer are higher than those by Goldmann tonometer.